Pamela Voss called Detective Ruiz herself.<\/p>\n
The real notary.<\/p>\n
The woman whose name and commission information appeared on the forged power of attorney.<\/p>\n
Until then, she had cooperated through formal requests.<\/p>\n
Now she wanted to speak directly.<\/p>\n
Ruiz arranged the interview.<\/p>\n
I attended only because Pamela specifically asked whether I would be present.<\/p>\n
That surprised me.<\/p>\n
We met in a small office.<\/p>\n
Pamela entered carrying a cardboard document box.<\/p>\n
She looked nervous.<\/p>\n
Not guilty-nervous, exactly.<\/p>\n
Embarrassed.<\/p>\n
\u201cI owe you an apology,\u201d she said before sitting.<\/p>\n
I looked at her.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you forge my signature?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you notarize it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why apologize?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause I think I know how they got my seal.\u201d<\/p>\n
She opened the box.<\/p>\n
Four years earlier, Pamela had handled a refinancing for Richard and Denise.<\/p>\n
Routine.<\/p>\n
Their signatures.<\/p>\n
Her notarial certificate.<\/p>\n
Embosser.<\/p>\n
Ink stamp.<\/p>\n
Commission number.<\/p>\n
Everything legitimate.<\/p>\n
She had given them closing copies.<\/p>\n
\u201cOne of those copies had a clean image of my stamp.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou think someone scanned it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCan that work?\u201d<\/p>\n
Pamela looked ashamed.<\/p>\n
\u201cVisually, yes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Ruiz clarified.<\/p>\n
\u201cNot legitimately. But enough to make a digital document appear notarized.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWould a bank catch it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIf they verified the notarial act.\u201d<\/p>\n
Again.<\/p>\n
Direct verification.<\/p>\n
Pamela continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere\u2019s more.\u201d<\/p>\n
She had received a call from Richard roughly eight months before Christmas.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he want?\u201d<\/p>\n
Ruiz asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cA mobile notarization.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor whom?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said a family member.\u201d<\/p>\n
My pulse increased.<\/p>\n
\u201cMe?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe gave your name.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat document?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cProperty transfer.\u201d<\/p>\n
The fake deed.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you meet me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI told him the signer had to appear before me.\u201d<\/p>\n
I almost smiled.<\/p>\n
One sentence.<\/p>\n
One professional rule.<\/p>\n
Signer must appear.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did Richard say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat you were traveling.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he ask about remote notarization?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAllowed?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cUnder certain procedures, but not the way he wanted.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat way?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe wanted to send me a signed page and have me complete the certificate.\u201d<\/p>\n
My anger rose.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe asked you to notarize a signature you didn\u2019t witness.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
Simple.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe got irritated.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said I was being rigid.\u201d<\/p>\n
I laughed.<\/p>\n
Rigidity had protected me more than flexibility.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he threaten you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOffer more money?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFive hundred dollars.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor an improper notarization?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe called it inconvenience compensation.\u201d<\/p>\n
Another phrase.<\/p>\n
Pamela refused.<\/p>\n
Two weeks later, Richard called again.<\/p>\n
This time he asked a technical question.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf an old notarized document is scanned into a new package, can software detect where the seal came from?\u201d<\/p>\n
Pamela\u2019s stomach apparently turned at the time.<\/p>\n
She asked why.<\/p>\n
Richard said he was dealing with document archiving.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you believe him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you do?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI made a note.\u201d<\/p>\n
She handed Ruiz a notebook.<\/p>\n
Dated.<\/p>\n
Time.<\/p>\n
Phone number.<\/p>\n
Summary.<\/p>\n
Richard had already been asking how detectable a copied seal might be.<\/p>\n
That connected him directly to the notary element.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy didn\u2019t you report it?\u201d<\/p>\n
Pamela looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause asking a strange question isn\u2019t a crime.\u201d<\/p>\n
Fair.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat changed?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAfter I learned my commission appeared on your power of attorney, I went back through old records.\u201d<\/p>\n
She found the refinancing package given to Denise and Richard.<\/p>\n
One page was missing from her archived copy?<\/p>\n
No.<\/p>\n
Her copy was complete.<\/p>\n
But she found an email from Denise sent weeks after the refinance asking for an additional PDF of the notarized signature page.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe said their accountant needed it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Pamela had sent it.<\/p>\n
The clean source file.<\/p>\n
I felt cold.<\/p>\n
\u201cDenise had a perfect digital copy.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Richard have access?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPresumably through their shared records.\u201d<\/p>\n
Evidence would decide.<\/p>\n
Then Pamela said, \u201cThere\u2019s one other person.\u201d<\/p>\n
Ruiz leaned forward.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cA document technician named Eric Moss.\u201d<\/p>\n
The name meant nothing.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe used to subcontract for my office.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he do?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPDF cleanup. Scanning. Form preparation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYears ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cConnection to Richard?\u201d<\/p>\n
Pamela looked uncomfortable.<\/p>\n
\u201cI referred Richard to him.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cFor what?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDocument organization.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAbout a year ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
That placed him right before the forged deed.<\/p>\n
Ruiz wrote quickly.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does Eric say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI haven\u2019t spoken to him.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
Pamela looked relieved.<\/p>\n
She had learned evidence protocol too.<\/p>\n
Investigators contacted Eric through proper channels.<\/p>\n
By the next day, he had counsel.<\/p>\n
That did not imply guilt.<\/p>\n
I reminded myself.<\/p>\n
Hiring counsel was not confession.<\/p>\n
Still, his digital footprint connected him to several files.<\/p>\n
He had performed paid document services for Hale Family Property Holdings.<\/p>\n
Scanning.<\/p>\n
Formatting.<\/p>\n
Combining PDFs.<\/p>\n
Creating templates.<\/p>\n
His invoice descriptions sounded harmless.<\/p>\n
Document conversion.<\/p>\n
Signature-block standardization.<\/p>\n
Form replication.<\/p>\n
That last one made my skin prickle.<\/p>\n
Ruiz explained.<\/p>\n
\u201cForm replication can be legitimate.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat matters is what he was asked to replicate.\u201d<\/p>\n
Eric\u2019s preserved emails answered that.<\/p>\n
Richard:<\/p>\n
Need reusable signature graphic for MB forms. Clean background.<\/p>\n
Eric:<\/p>\n
Does signer approve digital use?<\/p>\n
Richard:<\/p>\n
Yes. Family estate matter.<\/p>\n
Lie.<\/p>\n
Eric:<\/p>\n
Need sample.<\/p>\n
Richard sent my homeowner\u2019s insurance form.<\/p>\n
The one Chloe obtained.<\/p>\n
My signature.<\/p>\n
Eric returned a transparent PNG file.<\/p>\n
MB_SIG.png.<\/p>\n
I stared at the filename.<\/p>\n
A piece of me turned into software.<\/p>\n
Ruiz continued.<\/p>\n
Eric\u2019s message:<\/p>\n
Use only with signer authorization.<\/p>\n
Richard:<\/p>\n
Understood.<\/p>\n
Again.<\/p>\n
A warning.<\/p>\n
Direct.<\/p>\n
Written.<\/p>\n
Ignored.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Eric know it was unauthorized?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot from this exchange.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened later?\u201d<\/p>\n
A month afterward.<\/p>\n
Richard asked Eric to place the signature graphic into a deed draft \u201cfor review.\u201d<\/p>\n
Eric complied.<\/p>\n
That concerned me.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he think I had signed?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe says he believed this was document mockup work.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does the file say?\u201d<\/p>\n
Ruiz showed me.<\/p>\n
Watermark:<\/p>\n
DRAFT \u2014 NOT FOR EXECUTION.<\/p>\n
Interesting.<\/p>\n
The version Eric created had a large draft watermark.<\/p>\n
The final fake deed did not.<\/p>\n
Someone removed it later.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho?\u201d<\/p>\n
Metadata.<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s computer.<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
He had taken a legitimate-ish design service, removed the safety marking, and converted it into apparent execution.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about the power of attorney?\u201d<\/p>\n
Eric did not create it.<\/p>\n
But he had emailed Richard a blank template months earlier.<\/p>\n
\u201cNot unusual?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNotary seal?\u201d<\/p>\n
Eric denied copying it.<\/p>\n
Investigators checked.<\/p>\n
No source file on his retained work system.<\/p>\n
Then Richard\u2019s remote files produced the answer.<\/p>\n
A folder.<\/p>\n
SEALS.<\/p>\n
Inside were scanned notary blocks from old family documents.<\/p>\n
Pamela\u2019s.<\/p>\n
Another notary.<\/p>\n
A bank officer stamp.<\/p>\n
Richard had been collecting institutional marks the way he collected signatures.<\/p>\n
I felt nauseated.<\/p>\n
Not because I expected surprise anymore.<\/p>\n
Because of the deliberate organization.<\/p>\n
He did not simply improvise one forged guarantee in panic.<\/p>\n
He had built a toolbox.<\/p>\n
Signatures.<\/p>\n
Seals.<\/p>\n
IDs.<\/p>\n
Trust summaries.<\/p>\n
Medical history.<\/p>\n
Property records.<\/p>\n
Everything needed to manufacture apparent legitimacy.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he intend to do with the other seal?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cUnknown.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo more guessing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
Eric\u2019s records contained something else.<\/p>\n
A voice message from Richard.<\/p>\n
Months before Christmas.<\/p>\n
Need family docs standardized before deals start moving. Too many people slow down when they see signatures missing.<\/p>\n
I closed my eyes.<\/p>\n
Too many people slow down.<\/p>\n
He viewed signature requirements as friction.<\/p>\n
Not protection.<\/p>\n
Friction.<\/p>\n
Ruiz played another voice note.<\/p>\n
Eric had responded:<\/p>\n
That\u2019s the point. Missing signatures mean people haven\u2019t agreed.<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
A stranger had told Richard the entire moral truth in one sentence.<\/p>\n
Missing signatures mean people haven\u2019t agreed.<\/p>\n
Richard never answered.<\/p>\n
Instead, he stopped using Eric for certain tasks.<\/p>\n
He moved the work in-house.<\/p>\n
Chloe\u2019s laptop.<\/p>\n
His remote access.<\/p>\n
Copied seals.<\/p>\n
Editable PDFs.<\/p>\n
The moment a professional drew a boundary, Richard bypassed the professional.<\/p>\n
That pattern repeated everywhere.<\/p>\n
Lender requests direct call?<\/p>\n
Delay.<\/p>\n
Notary requires appearance?<\/p>\n
Find another.<\/p>\n
Doctor refuses incapacity evaluation?<\/p>\n
Ask for someone else.<\/p>\n
Signing agent insists on principal verification?<\/p>\n
Replace her.<\/p>\n
Trust lawyer says restrictions apply?<\/p>\n
Look for successor control.<\/p>\n
Every safeguard became a routing problem.<\/p>\n
That was Richard\u2019s core skill.<\/p>\n
Not finance.<\/p>\n
Circumvention.<\/p>\n
I told Daniel that later.<\/p>\n
He nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cAccurate.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow did nobody see it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPeople saw pieces.\u201d<\/p>\n
Pamela saw notary questions.<\/p>\n
Curtis saw asset modeling.<\/p>\n
Doctor Bell saw capacity inquiries.<\/p>\n
Title company saw closing irregularities.<\/p>\n
Bank saw an access attempt.<\/p>\n
Each professional held one fragment.<\/p>\n
No one saw the whole system until Christmas forced everything into the same file.<\/p>\n
That was another reason the scheme lasted.<\/p>\n
Complex misconduct hides inside specialization.<\/p>\n
Each person sees only their lane.<\/p>\n
Richard lived between lanes.<\/p>\n
The following week, investigators confronted him with Eric\u2019s records.<\/p>\n
Through counsel, he amended his statement again.<\/p>\n
He admitted requesting the digital signature image.<\/p>\n
Admitted removing the draft watermark.<\/p>\n
Admitted collecting old notary blocks \u201cfor formatting reference.\u201d<\/p>\n
Still denied intending to commit fraud.<\/p>\n
I almost admired the stubbornness.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he think he was doing?\u201d I asked Ruiz.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe says he was preparing documents in anticipation of family consent.\u201d<\/p>\n
I laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cPreparation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he explain why a fake notary seal was needed in anticipation of future consent?\u201d<\/p>\n
Ruiz\u2019s mouth twitched.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe did not provide a persuasive answer.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was as close to sarcasm as she came.<\/p>\n
Then she told me something more important.<\/p>\n
Richard had asked to enter formal cooperation discussions.<\/p>\n
Not just informal.<\/p>\n
His attorney wanted prosecutors involved.<\/p>\n
I felt my stomach tighten.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo charges are coming.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI cannot predict charging decisions.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does cooperation mean?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe may provide evidence about Denise and Chloe.\u201d<\/p>\n
I sat back.<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
The family turning outward.<\/p>\n
Once consequences arrived, loyalty rearranged.<\/p>\n
\u201cWill he blame everyone else?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPossibly.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWill evidence matter more?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Good.<\/p>\n
I did not want the last act of this story determined by whichever person confessed first.<\/p>\n
That evening, Chloe called through an agreed channel.<\/p>\n
No financial discussion without counsel.<\/p>\n
But she wanted to ask about Emma.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe wants to spend Saturday with you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Chloe paused.<\/p>\n
\u201cThank you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou don\u2019t need to thank me for loving my granddaughter.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
Silence.<\/p>\n
Then:<\/p>\n
\u201cDad is trying to make a deal.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI heard.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe\u2019s going to say everything was my idea.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI won\u2019t decide truth based on his story.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
She sounded exhausted.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe did create the signature file.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEvidence shows that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI uploaded the guarantee.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI knew.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
She cried quietly.<\/p>\n
I waited.<\/p>\n
Then she said, \u201cI\u2019m scared.\u201d<\/p>\n
I could have comforted her.<\/p>\n
Part of me wanted to.<\/p>\n
Another part refused to become her emotional shelter while facts were still being sorted.<\/p>\n
So I answered honestly.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat makes sense.\u201d<\/p>\n
Not:<\/p>\n
It\u2019ll be okay.<\/p>\n
Not:<\/p>\n
I\u2019ll help you.<\/p>\n
Just recognition.<\/p>\n
She breathed.<\/p>\n
\u201cEmma asked whether we can ever all have dinner together again.\u201d<\/p>\n
My throat tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat I don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI wanted to say yes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo did I.\u201d<\/p>\n
Silence.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe shouldn\u2019t promise children outcomes adults haven\u2019t earned.\u201d<\/p>\n
She cried harder.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
Then she said, \u201cI miss your kitchen.\u201d<\/p>\n
The sentence surprised me.<\/p>\n
I looked around the room.<\/p>\n
The same counters.<\/p>\n
Same window.<\/p>\n
Different locks.<\/p>\n
\u201cI believe you.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was all.<\/p>\n
After we ended, I opened a drawer.<\/p>\n
Inside were cookie cutters.<\/p>\n
Snowflakes.<\/p>\n
Stars.<\/p>\n
A bent Christmas tree.<\/p>\n
Ordinary tools.<\/p>\n
No legal significance.<\/p>\n
No evidence tag.<\/p>\n
For the first time in weeks, I found comfort in something that had never been copied, leveraged, pledged, or entered into a spreadsheet.<\/p>\n
Then my phone rang.<\/p>\n
Daniel.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe title company found another archived communication.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat now?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cA voicemail left for them Christmas Eve.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom Richard?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDenise?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cChloe?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMarissa.\u201d<\/p>\n
The signing agent.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did she say?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel played the transcription.<\/p>\n
This is Marissa Cole. I am not comfortable proceeding unless I speak directly with Martha Bennett. If someone instructs you otherwise, do not rely on my name as authorization.<\/p>\n
I closed my eyes.<\/p>\n
She had tried to stop them too.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid the title company receive it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why was she still listed?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHoliday staffing. The voicemail was not reviewed until after Christmas.\u201d<\/p>\n
Timing.<\/p>\n
Again.<\/p>\n
A safeguard existed.<\/p>\n
It simply arrived too late.<\/p>\n
Then Daniel continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is another voicemail.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom whom?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThomas Keller.\u201d<\/p>\n
The second signing agent.<\/p>\n
His message:<\/p>\n
I spoke with a male at the residence who refused access to the principal. I will not participate. Please flag the file.<\/p>\n
Two separate professionals had warned the title company before closing.<\/p>\n
One message delayed by holiday staffing.<\/p>\n
One note entered too late.<\/p>\n
The system had almost stopped the transaction even without me.<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s plan had been less secure than he believed.<\/p>\n
Built on assumptions.<\/p>\n
Timing.<\/p>\n
Silence.<\/p>\n
And other people not quite doing their jobs fast enough.<\/p>\n
I looked toward my front door.<\/p>\n
For months, I had imagined Richard as a mastermind because the scale of his plan frightened me.<\/p>\n
Now I saw something else.<\/p>\n
He was not unbeatable.<\/p>\n
He was persistent.<\/p>\n
There was a difference.<\/p>\n
And persistence works only until enough people stop bending.<\/p>\n
Pamela Voss called Detective Ruiz herself. The real notary. The woman whose name and commission information appeared on the forged power of attorney. Until then, she had cooperated through formal … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7271,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7306","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-feel-every-story"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7306","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7306"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7306\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7346,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7306\/revisions\/7346"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/7271"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}