By the time Claire returned home, she had decided that she would no longer allow the people connected to the estate to control the pace of the investigation. She had spent days waiting for answers, accepting fragments of explanations, and discovering that every new document contradicted something she had previously been told. From now on, every claim would need supporting evidence, and every person who wanted her trust would have to earn it.<\/p>\n
She placed the solicitor's instructions on the dining table and opened the folder containing her father's estate papers. The original declaration remained missing, but she now knew that it was the key to understanding the second account, the disputed transfers, and the person who had claimed authority to act on her behalf.<\/p>\n
Daniel called shortly after six.<\/p>\n
\u201cI heard from Northbridge,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
Claire remained silent for a moment. \u201cHow?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThey contacted me about the review. They said a solicitor had requested the account records.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat's my solicitor.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know. They asked whether I had any additional documentation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you tell them?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat I would provide anything relevant.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you tell them about the rejected transfer?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you tell them that the transfer came from an account connected to the estate?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire closed her eyes briefly. At least this time, he appeared to have answered honestly.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid they say anything about the payment I made?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThey said the review is ongoing. They haven't confirmed whether it will be applied to the debt.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid they explain why they accepted it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire took a breath.<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel, I need you to understand something. I'm not going to keep trying to save you from the consequences of decisions you made without me. If Northbridge claims the payment was valid, my solicitor will examine the agreement. If the estate has a claim to the money, we'll establish that through the proper process. I'm not going to make another financial decision based on your assurances.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI understand.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you have any documents that identify who authorized the transfer of the reserve fund?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot that I've found.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen search again. Look through every file you have from Arthur, including the correspondence you thought was irrelevant.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI will.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd don't contact Evelyn or Michael to ask them to change their statements.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI wouldn't do that.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire paused. \u201cI hope you're telling me the truth.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI am.\u201d<\/p>\n
She ended the call and opened the email from Margaret. The solicitor had confirmed receipt of the suspicious authorization and had begun preparing a formal request for the complete account records. She also wanted Claire to provide any evidence showing that her father had been the original trustee or that the estate had designated her as the beneficiary.<\/p>\n
Claire searched the cabinet again, examining the folders she had kept since her father's death. Most contained ordinary records: utility bills, tax forms, bank statements, and correspondence with the probate office. She found no declaration, but she did discover a small index card with her father's handwriting.<\/p>\n
The card listed three document references.<\/p>\n
Trust instrument.<\/p>\n
Beneficiary declaration.<\/p>\n
Transfer authorization.<\/p>\n
Beside the last item was a note.<\/p>\n
Original retained separately. Do not place with routine estate records.<\/p>\n
Claire stared at the words.<\/p>\n
Her father had deliberately kept the declaration apart from his ordinary papers. That might explain why it had never appeared in the estate inventory, but it also meant that someone could have removed it without disturbing the rest of the file.<\/p>\n
She photographed the card and sent it to Margaret.<\/p>\n
Then she called Evelyn.<\/p>\n
\u201cI found a reference card in my father's papers,\u201d Claire said. \u201cIt says the original declaration was retained separately. Do you know where he kept it?\u201d<\/p>\n
Evelyn was quiet for several seconds.<\/p>\n
\u201cYour father had a private solicitor,\u201d she said. \u201cArthur knew him, but I don't believe he maintained the full estate file.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho was the solicitor?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRichard Hale. He retired years ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you know whether he kept copies of the documents?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't know. But if Thomas retained the original separately, Richard may have known where it was stored.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire wrote down the name.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy didn't you tell me about him before?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause I didn't know he had been involved in the declaration. I knew he had advised your father on an earlier property matter, but I never saw a complete list of the professionals connected to the estate.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire thanked her and ended the call.<\/p>\n
She searched for Richard Hale's contact information and found that his former practice had merged with another firm. The website listed a general inquiry address, so she sent a brief message explaining that she was Thomas Morgan's daughter and needed to establish whether the firm retained records relating to a trust arrangement created eleven years earlier.<\/p>\n
She did not mention Daniel, Northbridge, or the disputed transfers. She wanted to know whether the records existed before revealing more than necessary.<\/p>\n
An hour later, she received a response from a senior administrator.<\/p>\n
The firm retained some historical records from Richard Hale's practice, but access would require verification of identity and the legal basis for the request. The administrator asked for Claire's father's full name, date of death, and a copy of the probate documentation.<\/p>\n
Claire sent the requested information.<\/p>\n
The following morning, she received a second email. The firm had located a file under Thomas Morgan's name. It contained a reference to a sealed declaration held in an off-site archive. The document had not been included in the routine probate file because it was classified as part of a separate trust arrangement.<\/p>\n
Claire read the email three times.<\/p>\n
The declaration might still exist.<\/p>\n
She called Margaret immediately.<\/p>\n
\u201cCan you request access to the archived document?\u201d Claire asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes. I'll contact the firm and establish the process. Don't attempt to retrieve it yourself until we know who has authority to release it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire agreed, though every part of her wanted to go directly to the archive and demand the original.<\/p>\n
That afternoon, Margaret confirmed that the firm could release a certified copy after reviewing the probate records and verifying Claire's identity. The process would take several business days.<\/p>\n
Several days felt unbearable, but Claire understood the need to proceed carefully. The declaration was too important to risk losing through a hurried request.<\/p>\n
In the meantime, she continued organizing the evidence. She created a timeline beginning with the original property transaction, followed by the first $42,000 transfer, the creation of the reserve account, the missing declaration, and Daniel's rejected $150,000 payment. She added the second $150,000 transfer from her personal savings and marked it as under review.<\/p>\n
The timeline made one fact unmistakable: the estate's money had been moved repeatedly while the beneficiary remained uninformed.<\/p>\n
On the third morning, Michael called.<\/p>\n
\u201cI've confirmed something about Northbridge,\u201d he said. \u201cThe company wasn't merely administering the settlement. It received an assignment of the original financing claims.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does that mean?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt means Northbridge acquired the right to collect certain debts associated with the failed property transaction. But the documents don't establish that it acquired ownership of the reserve fund itself.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire sat down.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo the company may have been collecting Daniel's debt while also holding money connected to the estate?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat's how the records appear. The two arrangements were supposed to remain separate, but the transfers blurred the distinction.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCould that explain why my payment was placed under review?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt could. The company may need to establish whether the payment belongs to the debt account or whether it should be treated as a disputed transaction. I can't give you a legal conclusion, but the records justify asking for a complete accounting.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire thanked him and sent the information to Margaret.<\/p>\n
That afternoon, Daniel arrived at the house carrying another box of documents. He had called beforehand and asked whether he could leave them at the door. Claire agreed to meet him in the hallway but made it clear that she was not inviting him to stay.<\/p>\n
He placed the box on the table.<\/p>\n
\u201cI found these in storage,\u201d he said. \u201cThey belonged to Arthur's original file.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire opened the box. Inside were several folders, each labeled with a date and a short description. One contained correspondence about the property transaction. Another held copies of the reserve account statements. The third was marked beneficiary records.<\/p>\n
Claire opened it carefully.<\/p>\n
The first page was a photocopy of the trust instrument. It described the reserve fund as money held for the benefit of a designated beneficiary whose identity would be confirmed through the original declaration. The fund could be used only for the purposes specified in the trust, and no personal debt could be charged against it without the beneficiary's written consent.<\/p>\n
Claire read the clause aloud.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo personal debt can be charged against the fund without the beneficiary's written consent.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel looked down.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou knew this clause existed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI had seen it before.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd you still attempted the transfer.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI believed Arthur had authority to settle the outstanding claims.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe document says the beneficiary's consent is required.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire closed the folder.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you ever obtain my written consent?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you ever ask me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
The admission left no room for misunderstanding. Whatever Daniel had believed about Arthur's authority, he had proceeded without the consent explicitly required by the trust instrument.<\/p>\n
Claire placed the document in a separate folder for Margaret.<\/p>\n
The next file contained a copy of the transfer authorization. The signature was blurred, but the typed name beneath it was clear.<\/p>\n
Evelyn Hartwell.<\/p>\n
Claire looked up.<\/p>\n
\u201cEvelyn's name is on the authorization.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel leaned over the table.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat doesn't mean she signed it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you ever ask her?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy not?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI assumed Arthur had arranged the transfer.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire examined the page again. The signature did not resemble Evelyn's handwriting in the letters she had received. The final stroke was unusually long, and the initials were written in a style similar to the disputed authorization Michael had found.<\/p>\n
\u201cSomeone used her name,\u201d Claire said.<\/p>\n
\u201cPerhaps.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOr she signed it and later denied knowing what it meant.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel shook his head. \u201cI don't think Evelyn would have authorized the transfer without telling Arthur.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen we need to establish who did.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire photographed the document and sent it to Margaret.<\/p>\n
The solicitor replied within minutes, asking her to preserve the original and avoid making accusations until the signature could be examined. Claire agreed. The investigation had already been distorted by assumptions, and she did not want to repeat the same mistake.<\/p>\n
As Daniel prepared to leave, Claire asked him one final question.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you ever see the original beneficiary declaration?\u201d<\/p>\n
He stopped beside the door.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot even when you opened the safe deposit box?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo. The declaration was missing when I arrived.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why did my father leave a note warning me to ask the person who witnessed the transfer?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel's face tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause he believed the witness knew where the declaration had gone.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho was the witness?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't know.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire stared at him.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou signed the transfer documents.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMichael signed some of them.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cArthur arranged the financing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEvelyn administered the trust.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd none of you knows who witnessed the transfer?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel looked exhausted.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe document I signed wasn't the same document your father referred to. There were several transactions. I witnessed one payment authorization, but I never saw the original declaration.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire allowed the distinction to settle in her mind. It might be true. It might also be another carefully limited answer. She needed the original records to establish what each person had actually signed.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen I want you to write down exactly which documents you witnessed,\u201d she said. \u201cInclude the dates, the people present, and what you remember about the signatures. If you don't remember something, say so. Don't fill in the gaps.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI will.\u201d<\/p>\n
He left without asking whether she would call him later.<\/p>\n
Two days passed before Margaret contacted Claire with an update. The former solicitor's firm had located the archived declaration and confirmed that it was intact. A certified copy would be available the following morning.<\/p>\n
Claire barely slept that night. She kept thinking about the final signature, the person who had claimed to represent her, and the possibility that her father had known more than he had been able to explain before his death.<\/p>\n
At ten the next morning, she met Margaret at the firm's office. The administrator brought them into a conference room and placed a sealed archival envelope on the table. After verifying Claire's identity and obtaining her signature, she opened the envelope and removed several pages.<\/p>\n
The first page was the original beneficiary declaration.<\/p>\n
Claire's full name appeared in the center of the document.<\/p>\n
Claire Morgan.<\/p>\n
Beneath it was the account reference and the date the reserve fund had been established. The document confirmed that she was the designated beneficiary, with the right to receive the remaining funds once the specified obligations had been resolved.<\/p>\n
She felt her eyes sting.<\/p>\n
For years, she had believed her father had left her a modest inheritance and little else. Now she was holding a document proving that he had arranged a separate fund for her future, a fund that had been kept beyond her reach while other people argued over the money.<\/p>\n
Margaret continued reading.<\/p>\n
The declaration included a clause requiring the trustee to notify Claire if the original document could not be located within a specified period. It also prohibited the use of the reserve fund to satisfy personal obligations unless Claire provided written consent.<\/p>\n
The final page contained a section identifying the person authorized to witness the transfer of the declaration into safekeeping.<\/p>\n
Claire read the name.<\/p>\n
Michael Reed.<\/p>\n
She looked at Margaret.<\/p>\n
\u201cMichael was the witness?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAccording to this document, yes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire remembered her father's letter, the warning about the person who witnessed the transfer, and Michael's repeated claims that he had never understood where the money went. If he had witnessed the declaration being transferred into safekeeping, he might know more about its disappearance than he had admitted.<\/p>\n
Margaret turned to the final section.<\/p>\n
There was another signature beneath Michael's, marked as the receiving custodian's acknowledgment.<\/p>\n
Claire stared at it.<\/p>\n
The signature belonged to Evelyn Hartwell.<\/p>\n
But beneath her name was a handwritten note, dated three days after the declaration had supposedly been placed in safekeeping.<\/p>\n
Received without original seal. Custody disputed.<\/p>\n
Claire's pulse quickened.<\/p>\n
The declaration had been transferred without its original seal, and Evelyn had immediately questioned the custody arrangement. That meant the document might have been copied or moved before it was formally secured.<\/p>\n
\u201cCan we contact Michael?\u201d Claire asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe can ask him to provide a statement about the transfer,\u201d Margaret replied. \u201cBut we should first establish whether the document we have is complete and whether the signatures are authentic.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire nodded.<\/p>\n
Margaret arranged for the declaration to be copied and certified, then placed the original back into the archival envelope. She explained that the document would be preserved while they requested the remaining records and sought an accounting of the reserve fund.<\/p>\n
Claire left the office carrying a certified copy.<\/p>\n
For the first time, she had documentary proof that the money was intended for her. The question of ownership was no longer based on Daniel's recollections, Evelyn's statements, or Michael's suspicions. The declaration established her rights, subject to the terms of the trust and the outstanding legal issues.<\/p>\n
But it also revealed that the original transfer had been disputed from the beginning.<\/p>\n
Claire called Michael from the car.<\/p>\n
\u201cI've seen the declaration,\u201d she said. \u201cYour name is listed as the witness.\u201d<\/p>\n
He did not answer immediately.<\/p>\n
\u201cMichael?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy didn't you tell me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause I didn't remember the exact wording until I saw the original.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou witnessed the transfer.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho received the declaration?\u201d<\/p>\n
Michael took a slow breath.<\/p>\n
\u201cEvelyn.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why did she write that custody was disputed?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause the document was supposed to be delivered with its original seal. When I handed it over, the seal was missing.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire gripped the steering wheel.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho removed it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWas Daniel there?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWas Arthur there?\u201d<\/p>\n
Michael hesitated.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire closed her eyes.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen Arthur witnessed the transfer, too.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe was present when the document was delivered. But he left before Evelyn examined it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy didn't you tell me this earlier?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause I thought the declaration had been recovered years ago. I didn't realize the copy you found was connected to the original transfer.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire looked at the certified copy on the passenger seat.<\/p>\n
\u201cSomeone removed the seal before the document reached Evelyn. Someone authorized a transfer in my name without my consent. And the reserve fund was moved to Northbridge while the declaration was missing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho did it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don't know, Claire. But there was one person who had access to the declaration before it was transferred.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho?\u201d<\/p>\n
Michael's answer came quietly.<\/p>\n
\u201cYour father.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire stared at the road ahead.<\/p>\n
Her father had created the fund, written the warning, and retained the declaration separately. He had also been the last person known to possess the original before it entered the disputed custody arrangement.<\/p>\n
That did not mean he had done anything wrong. He might have been trying to protect the document from someone else. But the records had now placed him at the beginning of the chain of custody, and the final signature showed that the declaration had been transferred without its original seal.<\/p>\n
Claire ended the call and sat in silence.<\/p>\n
Her father had tried to protect her, but he had also kept the arrangement secret. Daniel had tried to protect their marriage, but he had concealed the truth. Evelyn had tried to preserve the estate, but she had failed to establish where the declaration went. Michael had tried to protect himself, but he had withheld information about the transfer.<\/p>\n
Every person involved had made a decision based on what they believed was safest.<\/p>\n
And every decision had left Claire with less information and less control.<\/p>\n
She looked down at the certified declaration.<\/p>\n
The final page included one additional reference she had not noticed in the conference room. Beneath the disputed custody note was a handwritten instruction, apparently added by Thomas Morgan before the document was transferred.<\/p>\n
If the declaration is separated from its original seal, the beneficiary must be given the accompanying letter.<\/p>\n
Claire's breath caught.<\/p>\n
There was an accompanying letter.<\/p>\n
The archive administrator had provided every page contained in the envelope, but the declaration referred to a separate document that was not included in the file.<\/p>\n
Claire called Margaret immediately.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere's another letter,\u201d she said. \u201cThe declaration says the beneficiary must receive it if the original seal is missing.\u201d<\/p>\n
Margaret paused.<\/p>\n
\u201cWas the letter in the archival envelope?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen we'll need to ask the firm to check the archive records and determine whether it was stored separately.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire looked at the signature beneath the instruction. It was her father's, unmistakable and carefully written.<\/p>\n
The missing declaration had named her as the beneficiary.<\/p>\n
The absent seal suggested someone had interfered with its custody.<\/p>\n
And the accompanying letter might explain why her father had insisted that she receive the truth only after the document was recovered.<\/p>\n
Claire sent Margaret a photograph of the instruction and asked her to request an immediate search of the archive.<\/p>\n
Then she called Daniel.<\/p>\n
\u201cI found the original declaration,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n
He went silent.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt confirms that I'm the beneficiary. It also shows that the document was transferred to Evelyn without its original seal.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI didn't know that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMichael witnessed the transfer. Arthur was present. And my father left an instruction saying that an accompanying letter must be given to me if the seal is missing.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel breathed out slowly.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen we need to find the letter.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes,\u201d Claire said. \u201cAnd when we do, I want the truth about the second account, the rejected transfer, and the person who acted in my name.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI'll help you.\u201d<\/p>\n
Claire looked at the certified declaration lying beside her.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou can help by telling the truth about everything you remember. No more deciding what I should know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI understand.\u201d<\/p>\n
She ended the call.<\/p>\n
For the first time since she had transferred the $150,000, Claire felt that the investigation had reached solid ground. She had the declaration, a clear record of her rights, and a new document to pursue. She still did not know where the reserve fund had gone, whether Northbridge could legally retain her payment, or who had authorized the disputed transfers.<\/p>\n
But she now knew that her father had anticipated the possibility that the declaration would be separated from its seal. He had left an instruction for the day when someone finally recovered it.<\/p>\n
That meant he had not simply feared that the document might disappear.<\/p>\n
He had feared that someone would alter the meaning of what it proved.<\/p>\n
And somewhere, the accompanying letter was still missing.<\/p>\n
By the time Claire returned home, she had decided that she would no longer allow the people connected to the estate to control the pace of the investigation. She had … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":16215,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16227","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-feel-every-story"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16227","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16227"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16227\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16262,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16227\/revisions\/16262"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/16215"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16227"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16227"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16227"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}