For several seconds, none of us spoke.<\/p>\n
The diagram on Daniel\u2019s monitor looked deceptively clean.<\/p>\n
Boxes.<\/p>\n
Lines.<\/p>\n
Names.<\/p>\n
Trusts.<\/p>\n
Entities.<\/p>\n
A structure arranged with the calm precision of an architect\u2019s plan.<\/p>\n
But my eight-year-old son\u2019s name sat at the bottom.<\/p>\n
Sam Mercer.<\/p>\n
Contingent control.<\/p>\n
Guardian and trustee upon triggering event: Claire B. Mercer.<\/p>\n
I read the line again.<\/p>\n
Then again.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
My voice sounded far away.<\/p>\n
Jessica touched my arm.<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
David stood behind Daniel\u2019s chair, gripping it so hard his knuckles had gone white.<\/p>\n
\u201cI never saw this.\u201d<\/p>\n
I turned toward him.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou expect me to believe that?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYour company is in it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYour son is in it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMy name is in it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI can see that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd you never saw it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
The answer came hard enough to sound angry.<\/p>\n
Not at me.<\/p>\n
At the screen.<\/p>\n
Detective Vega stepped closer.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho prepares succession documents for Mercer?\u201d<\/p>\n
David stared at the diagram.<\/p>\n
\u201cUsually Rachel Stern.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThis one?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLook at the formatting.\u201d<\/p>\n
He leaned toward the monitor.<\/p>\n
Daniel enlarged the footer.<\/p>\n
No firm name.<\/p>\n
No attorney identification.<\/p>\n
Only a version number and internal reference code.<\/p>\n
JNR-SP-4C.<\/p>\n
David\u2019s face changed.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat numbering system.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou recognize it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom where?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCedar Bridge.\u201d<\/p>\n
Jessica folded her arms.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou\u2019re certain?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot completely.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen be useful instead of dramatic.\u201d<\/p>\n
He shot her a look.<\/p>\n
She did not blink.<\/p>\n
David exhaled.<\/p>\n
\u201cCedar Bridge used internal project codes like that on the financing schedules. Three letters, then document category, then revision.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cJNR for Juniper.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSP for succession plan.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cProbably.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd 4C?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFourth version, third revision. Something like that.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
Fourth version.<\/p>\n
This had not been an accidental draft.<\/p>\n
Someone revised it.<\/p>\n
Repeatedly.<\/p>\n
Vega looked at Daniel.<\/p>\n
\u201cMetadata?\u201d<\/p>\n
He checked.<\/p>\n
\u201cCreated thirty-one months ago. Modified seventeen times.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAuthor?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cStripped.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPrevious versions?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPossibly embedded. I\u2019ll need time.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stared at Sam\u2019s name.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen was this created?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel gave me the date.<\/p>\n
I knew it immediately.<\/p>\n
Two days after the dinner at our house.<\/p>\n
The dinner where Richard Voss had asked Sam what he would do if somebody gave him a mountain.<\/p>\n
The dinner where he had asked me what I would do with something valuable if owning it could hurt someone I loved.<\/p>\n
The answer I had given as a joke now sat like a signature across the entire structure.<\/p>\n
I\u2019d make sure they never owned it.<\/p>\n
Jessica saw something in my face.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
I told her the date.<\/p>\n
David slowly lowered himself into a chair.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat dinner.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou remember it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho was there?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou. Me. Richard. Ethan. Laura.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnyone else?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy were they at our house?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cJuniper.\u201d<\/p>\n
The word landed differently now.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou brought Juniper into our home?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI didn\u2019t call it that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you call it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cA land investment discussion.\u201d<\/p>\n
I laughed once.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou discussed a secret land scheme at dinner while our son was upstairs.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe wasn\u2019t supposed to come down.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s your defense?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
Vega interrupted.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat was discussed?\u201d<\/p>\n
David looked toward the monitor.<\/p>\n
\u201cRichard was explaining how the corridor could transform the land value.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he say where his information came from?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you ask?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot that night.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did Laura do?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe had Red Mesa documents.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEthan?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFinancing models.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd Claire?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe wasn\u2019t part of the meeting.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stared at him.<\/p>\n
\u201cI was serving dinner.\u201d<\/p>\n
His shame showed.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou brought four people into my house to discuss a transaction using property connected to our marriage, and I was serving dinner.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at Vega.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat matters.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt may.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt tells you exactly how easy it was for them to use my name. David had already decided I didn\u2019t belong in the room.\u201d<\/p>\n
He flinched.<\/p>\n
I kept going.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf they needed signatures later, he wouldn\u2019t have expected me to know enough to question them.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s not what happened.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou don\u2019t know what happened.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo,\u201d he said quietly. \u201cI don\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was the first time he stopped fighting the obvious.<\/p>\n
Daniel opened the trust instrument.<\/p>\n
The document was dense.<\/p>\n
Too dense to absorb quickly.<\/p>\n
Jessica moved beside him and began reading line by line.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis was not created through ordinary estate planning.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat is it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cA contingent beneficial-interest trust.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIn English.\u201d<\/p>\n
She pointed.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf Red Mesa interests transferred under certain conditions, the economic benefit would pass to a trust for Sam.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWithout us knowing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cApparently.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho controls the trust?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cInitially an independent trustee.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel scrolled.<\/p>\n
Cedar Fiduciary Services.<\/p>\n
I almost laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnother Cedar.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRelated to Cedar Bridge?\u201d Vega asked.<\/p>\n
Daniel searched.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes. Same office address.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho owns Cedar Fiduciary?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLet me check.\u201d<\/p>\n
The answer appeared in a state filing.<\/p>\n
Stephen Carrow.<\/p>\n
The attorney who had built the Juniper entities.<\/p>\n
The attorney who had told Mason to stop using my name.<\/p>\n
Jessica read further.<\/p>\n
\u201cHere.\u201d<\/p>\n
She pointed to another clause.<\/p>\n
\u201cUpon a triggering event, the initial trustee resigns.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTriggering event meaning what?\u201d<\/p>\n
She scrolled.<\/p>\n
Death.<\/p>\n
Incapacity.<\/p>\n
Divorce.<\/p>\n
Regulatory seizure.<\/p>\n
Default across specified obligations.<\/p>\n
I felt cold.<\/p>\n
\u201cAll of those?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happens then?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSuccessor trustee provisions apply.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho?\u201d<\/p>\n
She already knew.<\/p>\n
Her eyes moved toward me.<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire.\u201d<\/p>\n
I laughed because I could not think of another response.<\/p>\n
\u201cI never agreed to this.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI never signed it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen how can it be valid?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt may not be.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMay?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire, people can create trusts naming beneficiaries or successor trustees without the beneficiary or trustee knowing. Whether obligations can legally attach to you is another matter.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo the document could name me without making me responsible.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut it could make someone think I was responsible.\u201d<\/p>\n
Jessica nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat may have been the point.\u201d<\/p>\n
The same pattern again.<\/p>\n
Paperwork designed not necessarily to be enforceable forever, but to create confusion long enough to direct blame.<\/p>\n
Daniel opened the ledger from Mason\u2019s archive.<\/p>\n
It showed Juniper-related flows across entities.<\/p>\n
Some entries matched records we already knew.<\/p>\n
Others did not.<\/p>\n
Large payments appeared under abbreviations.<\/p>\n
RV.<\/p>\n
SC.<\/p>\n
EP.<\/p>\n
LB.<\/p>\n
DM.<\/p>\n
And one line repeated several times.<\/p>\n
CBM CONT.<\/p>\n
My initials.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat is CONT?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel studied surrounding entries.<\/p>\n
\u201cContingent allocation, maybe.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMoney went to me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen what?\u201d<\/p>\n
He traced the ledger columns.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt looks like accounting attribution rather than payment.\u201d<\/p>\n
Jessica leaned closer.<\/p>\n
\u201cAttributed for what?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cExposure.\u201d<\/p>\n
My pulse quickened.<\/p>\n
\u201cExplain.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel pointed.<\/p>\n
\u201cThese columns track who would bear economic responsibility if obligations shifted under specific scenarios.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cScenarios.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDefault. Death. Divorce. Regulatory action.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd CBM?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire Bennett Mercer appears repeatedly as a contingent endpoint.\u201d<\/p>\n
Mason\u2019s note had used that exact phrase.<\/p>\n
Endpoint for liability.<\/p>\n
David stood.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
We all looked at him.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat was not the structure I agreed to.\u201d<\/p>\n
Jessica\u2019s voice sharpened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you agree to?\u201d<\/p>\n
David paced once, then stopped.<\/p>\n
\u201cRichard told me Juniper risk would remain inside Red Mesa and Cedar Bridge.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMercer funded it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTemporarily.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYour properties secured it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTemporarily.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMy insurance secured it.\u201d<\/p>\n
He looked sick.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat was supposed to be temporary too.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo everything dangerous was temporary until suddenly it wasn\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho explained the structure?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRichard and Stephen.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cStephen Carrow.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWas Ethan there?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor most of it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLaura?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor execution.\u201d<\/p>\n
I pointed at the succession plan.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho came up with this?\u201d<\/p>\n
David looked at the document.<\/p>\n
Then said, \u201cStephen.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou know that?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI recognize the logic.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is not the same thing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why say his name?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause he once said something.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
David sat again.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said Juniper needed a family continuity layer.\u201d<\/p>\n
I went still.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAround the time Red Mesa was formed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did that mean?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI thought he meant estate continuity if something happened to me.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he mention Sam?\u201d<\/p>\n
David hesitated.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
The room changed.<\/p>\n
I felt my anger sharpen.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou said you never saw him involved.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI never saw this.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Stephen mention Sam?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat exactly did he say?\u201d<\/p>\n
David closed his eyes briefly.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said, \u2018If we\u2019re building around David, we need continuity through David\u2019s issue.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIssue?\u201d<\/p>\n
Jessica answered quietly.<\/p>\n
\u201cLegal term for descendants.\u201d<\/p>\n
My hands went cold.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe called my son an issue.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIn estate language,\u201d Jessica said.<\/p>\n
\u201cI know what he meant.\u201d<\/p>\n
David looked miserable.<\/p>\n
\u201cI told him Sam was not involved.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd then?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cStephen said involvement and contingency were different.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you object?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you stop the deal?\u201d<\/p>\n
Silence.<\/p>\n
That was the answer.<\/p>\n
I stared at him.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou objected enough to feel better about yourself.\u201d<\/p>\n
He took it.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut not enough to leave.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
Vega spoke.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Carrow ever tell you Claire would become successor trustee?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he discuss divorce as a trigger?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot with me.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Richard?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEthan?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLaura?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
Vega wrote something down.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo at least one part of this succession structure may have been built outside your knowledge.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at David.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd you still signed enough documents to support it.\u201d<\/p>\n
He nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
No excuses.<\/p>\n
That somehow hurt worse.<\/p>\n
Daniel opened Mason\u2019s letter.<\/p>\n
The filename read:<\/p>\n
IF CLAIRE FINDS THIS.<\/p>\n
My name again.<\/p>\n
I felt suddenly reluctant to continue.<\/p>\n
Jessica noticed.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe can stop.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cClaire.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo one stops anymore.\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel opened the letter.<\/p>\n
It was not long.<\/p>\n
Mason had written it like someone who expected not to be present when it was read.<\/p>\n
Claire\u2014<\/p>\n
If you are reading this, then Juniper moved further than I expected or someone finally opened the files. You probably believe David put you inside this structure. He helped create the conditions that allowed it. That is not the same as designing your role.<\/p>\n
I looked at David.<\/p>\n
He stared at the screen.<\/p>\n
The letter continued.<\/p>\n
David is guilty of greed, concealment, cowardice, and believing wealthy men become safe simply because they understand the contracts they sign. He is not the person who chose you as the contingency endpoint.<\/p>\n
My chest tightened.<\/p>\n
Jessica read silently beside me.<\/p>\n
Mason wrote that the idea of using me had emerged after the dinner at our house.<\/p>\n
Richard had described me as \u201cfinancially literate enough to stabilize the family, invisible enough to remain outside the business story.\u201d<\/p>\n
I felt sick.<\/p>\n
Invisible enough.<\/p>\n
David whispered, \u201cJesus.\u201d<\/p>\n
Mason continued.<\/p>\n
Stephen Carrow turned that observation into structure.<\/p>\n
According to Mason, Carrow believed the safest hidden system was one that ultimately collapsed into someone respectable and apparently uninvolved.<\/p>\n
A spouse.<\/p>\n
A mother.<\/p>\n
Someone whose name could plausibly appear in marital documents without attracting immediate suspicion.<\/p>\n
Someone who would spend months proving she had not authorized things instead of investigators asking who had.<\/p>\n
I had become camouflage.<\/p>\n
Not because I knew too much.<\/p>\n
Because I knew nothing.<\/p>\n
Mason\u2019s letter said Ethan discovered the false authorization chain by accident.<\/p>\n
He noticed my signature attached to an account opened while I was in Colorado.<\/p>\n
He confronted Stephen.<\/p>\n
Stephen claimed it was an administrative placeholder that would be corrected.<\/p>\n
It never was.<\/p>\n
Ethan began copying records.<\/p>\n
Laura discovered some of those copies.<\/p>\n
Then Mason entered the picture.<\/p>\n
My anger toward Ethan shifted.<\/p>\n
Not vanished.<\/p>\n
Shifted.<\/p>\n
He had known.<\/p>\n
He had stayed.<\/p>\n
But perhaps he had also been trying to unwind what he helped build.<\/p>\n
The letter continued.<\/p>\n
If David changed his estate plan, that is important. The structure assumed Claire remained the natural bridge between David\u2019s assets and Sam. Removing her from the succession chain would force Cedar Bridge to rewrite multiple contingency routes. That may be why they accelerated the divorce structure.<\/p>\n
I looked at David.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou changed the will and broke their plan.\u201d<\/p>\n
He stared at the screen.<\/p>\n
\u201cWithout knowing it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
The letter ended with one final warning.<\/p>\n
Do not assume Richard controls Stephen Carrow. I made that mistake for six months.<\/p>\n
Vega straightened.<\/p>\n
Daniel looked at her.<\/p>\n
Jessica whispered, \u201cThere it is.\u201d<\/p>\n
The same warning again.<\/p>\n
Not the obvious person.<\/p>\n
David\u2019s voice was low.<\/p>\n
\u201cStephen worked for Richard.\u201d<\/p>\n
Mason\u2019s final line said otherwise.<\/p>\n
Richard Voss may have financed Juniper. Stephen Carrow built it. Those are not the same thing.<\/p>\n
The room became very quiet.<\/p>\n
I looked at the succession plan.<\/p>\n
At Sam\u2019s name.<\/p>\n
At mine.<\/p>\n
At the legal structure Stephen Carrow had revised seventeen times.<\/p>\n
All along, we had been asking who supplied the money.<\/p>\n
Maybe that was the wrong question.<\/p>\n
Money financed Juniper.<\/p>\n
But somebody else had designed where the blame would go if it failed.<\/p>\n
And that person had chosen me.<\/p>\n
For several seconds, none of us spoke. The diagram on Daniel\u2019s monitor looked deceptively clean. Boxes. Lines. Names. Trusts. Entities. A structure arranged with the calm precision of an architect\u2019s … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13756,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-feel-every-story"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13769","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13769"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13769\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13804,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13769\/revisions\/13804"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/13756"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13769"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13769"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feeleverystory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}